#1 by volume#9 by sales#232 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)
metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.
demand & order book
Weak / thin demand
Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).
wash volume
0%
same-NFT round-trips
bid cancel
0.8×
14,047 cancelled / 17,003 created
offers accepted
0%
sales meeting real demand
sales / buyer
3.5
8,610 buyers
bid activity over time all-time
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-10 06:16:15 UTC
Fuddies' tracked volume of 4,897,369 SUI indicates a solid historical presence, though its recent 7-day volume of 28 SUI and 3 sales are below typical top collection activity. The collection boasts a strong distribution with a top-10 holder concentration of 16%, notably less concentrated than the typical 26% for top collections, and its 4% bot-flagged holders are also below the typical 9%. Furthermore, Fuddies exhibits excellent market integrity with wash-traded volume at 0.1%, perfectly in line with the typical top collection median, and its largest single first-funder fan-out of 2453 buyers suggests a broad initial reach.
signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below
•Top 10 holders hold 16% of supply
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history
wash rateall tracked
0.1%
3.4k SUI washed
holder conc.current
16%
top-10 share of supply
bot holderscurrent
4%
score ≥ 0.30
volume7d
28
▼ 21% vs prior 7d
volume30d
131 SUI
trailing 30d
velocity7d
3
sales / 7d
tracked volume 4.9M SUItracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-10
supply & profit-taking
93%of held supply underwater
93% of the 10,000 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)
20 SUI
floor (robust)
120 SUI
median cost
10,000
held
<0.5×
122
0.5–1×
541
1–1.5×
135
1.5–2×
158
2–3×
257
3–5×
2,490
5×+
6,297
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
sweep cost depth
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
floor 13 SUIlisted 322 / 10,000 (3.2%) real sweep floor × n
bid wall depth
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
181 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.0–53 SUI (1 bids) collection single
sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
6.3dmedian hold before sale
5.5h
p10 (fastest flips)
8mo
p90
18,176
sales measured
489
<1h
4,136
1-24h
4,626
1-7d
2,568
7-30d
1,764
30-90d
3,640
90-365d
953
>365d
minted/airdropped (178) bought secondary (17,998)
demand authenticity — funding sources all-time
mixed / inconclusive funding
■ organic 0■ mid 0■ manufactured 00 of 8,610 buyers have a known first-funder
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
tracked sales
30,083
volume
4,897,354 SUI
distinct buyers
8,681
6,271 sellers
distinct NFTs traded
10,456
price distribution all-time
p10
67.69 SUI
p50 (median)
120.00 SUI
p90
300.00 SUI
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
marketplace mix (top 5) all-time
originbyte
33.3%
clutchy
26.7%
tocen
20.0%
other
13.3%
tradeport
6.7%
activity window
first sale
2023-05-04 00:00:00 UTC
last activity
2026-06-05 14:28:34 UTC
holder whale-map current holders
top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 2,918 holders across 10,000 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
holder accumulation ribbon all-time
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 53 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
mint-snipe timeline launch window
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
120 launch-window saleswindow 35s
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
shared user base all-time
collections most-bought by this collection's 8,610 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.
trait-premium heatmap all-time
each cell is a trait value, colored by its median sale price vs the collection median (14.99 SUI) — green = premium, rose = discount. Traits ranked by how much their best value beats the floor. Reveals which traits actually drive value.
Head
Halo1.9×
Fast Food1.6×
Mohawk1.3×
Punk1.2×
Fire1.2×
Party1.1×
Sailor1.1×
Police1.1×
Whirligig1.1×
Propeller1.1×
Beer1.1×
Cowboy1.1×
Bobble1.1×
Sombrero1.1×
Bucket1.0×
Sushi1.0×
Santa1.0×
Worms1.0×
Cap1.0×
Shower1.0×
Poop1.0×
Trump1.0×
FUD1.0×
Devil Horns1.0×
Cake1.0×
Eyes
Fire1.7×
Laser1.3×
Nouns1.1×
Spritz1.1×
Water1.1×
Skygazing1.1×
Air1.1×
Shy1.0×
Exotropic1.0×
Befuddled1.00×
Astonished0.99×
Multitasking0.99×
Esotropic0.99×
Focused0.96×
Confused0.96×
Side Eye0.95×
Lightning0.94×
Visionary0.93×
Tripping0.83×
Daydreaming0.83×
Ping Pong0.80×
Clothes
Fast Food1.2×
Cow1.2×
Puffer1.2×
Wings1.2×
Mankini1.2×
Katana1.1×
Flamboyant1.1×
Scarf1.1×
Fuddies1.1×
Wizard1.1×
Briefs1.1×
Pimp1.1×
Flag1.1×
Kimono1.1×
Shirt1.1×
Backpack1.0×
Iced Out1.0×
Pipe1.0×
Ruffles1.0×
Wife Beater1.0×
Tie1.0×
Turtle Neck1.0×
Caveman1.0×
Jeans0.99×
Ribbon0.99×
Skin
Skeleton1.0×
X-Ray1.0×
Orange1.0×
Blue1.0×
Gold1.0×
Grey1.0×
Purple1.0×
Gummy1.00×
Neon0.99×
Brown0.96×
Pink0.96×
White0.94×
Red0.93×
Black0.89×
Zombie0.80×
Lava0.73×
Robot0.69×
Trippy0.37×
Background
Mint0.99×
Fuchsia0.99×
Lemon0.99×
Turquoise0.98×
Lavender0.95×
Orange0.93×
Median sale price per trait value (≥5 sales each).
trait-floor heatmap active
each cell is the cheapest CURRENTLY-listed NFT carrying that trait — brighter = pricier floorvs the collection's cheapest trait. The live-market mirror of trait premiums (settled sales). Cells with < 3 listings are greyed — too thin to trust the floor.
1/1
NFT Enjoyer16.9k · 1
Clothes
Gold Robe2.5k · 1
None2.0k · 2
Lollipop310 · 2
Polo305 · 1
Vest300 · 1
Pencil299 · 1
Fuddies128 · 1
Tuxedo100 · 2
Chain100 · 1
Turtle Neck50 · 3
Wizard35 · 1
Tie28 · 2
Backpack25 · 3
Bow Tie24 · 3
Oven Mitts24 · 1
Shirt22 · 1
Overalls22 · 1
Poncho20 · 2
Pimp20 · 1
Jeans18 · 1
Bomber15 · 2
Gym15 · 1
Joggers13 · 1
Eyes
Ping Pong2.0k · 1
Befuddled310 · 1
Esotropic302 · 1
Focused128 · 2
Skygazing100 · 1
Lightning100 · 1
Shy35 · 3
Confused25 · 3
Water24 · 1
Side Eye24 · 2
Exotropic22 · 4
Visionary20 · 1
Tripping15 · 4
Astonished15 · 5
Multitasking13 · 5
Skin
Lava2.0k · 1
Tsunami300 · 1
Orange299 · 4
White128 · 1
Gummy100 · 1
Robot50 · 3
Black35 · 4
Neon25 · 1
Red24 · 1
Pink22 · 3
Grey20 · 4
Zombie15 · 1
Blue15 · 6
Purple13 · 4
Head
Rice316 · 1
Beanie312 · 1
Punk310 · 1
Clown305 · 1
Headband302 · 1
Cake300 · 1
Headphones100 · 3
Fez100 · 1
Pirate75 · 1
Fire70 · 2
Fast Food52 · 2
None50 · 3
Visor50 · 1
Comb Over35 · 2
Propeller28 · 1
Cap25 · 1
Sushi24 · 2
Ninja24 · 1
Mohawk22 · 1
Ear Muffs20 · 3
Baby20 · 1
Santa18 · 1
Afro15 · 1
Sombrero15 · 1
Squire13 · 1
Background
Lemon28 · 2
Turquoise22 · 7
Lavender22 · 5
Fuchsia20 · 7
Orange15 · 9
Mint13 · 5
Floor SUI · # listed, per trait value. Validated active listings only.
most-traded NFTs all-time
individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 8,610 total buyers.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 32 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.