all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
This 0x15ea…1aee wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a "router" contract, likely performing some basic token swaps. Given the low activity and the absence of any bot-like signals, it seems to be a perfectly normal, albeit unexciting, human user. This wallet is so legitimately boring, it almost makes you wonder if it's a bot trying to *look* human.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x15ea536b629c123426d9cae1d74224390c07c2a139b75249266adf9a057e1aee",
"n_tx": 3,
"n_successful_tx": 3,
"n_distinct_epochs": 1,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 161255094,
"last_seen_cp": 161255179,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1751016883284,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1751016903962,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 7549368,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 2,
"n_sponsored_tx": 1,
"gas_price_p50": 742,
"gas_price_p95": 742,
"active_hours_top24": [
9
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.