all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x439a…146c wallet appears to be a casual participant in a gaming or lottery-like protocol, primarily engaging with a `game::evaluate_ticket` function, suggesting it's checking outcomes or participating in draws. It also interacts with `redeem::redeem` and `user::stake` functions, indicating it might be claiming rewards or staking within this same system. This wallet looks like a normal human user, as its bot score is a pristine 0.00, with no signals fired, making it remarkably boringly legitimate.
marketplace NFT sales from analytics.sale. Net = proceeds − spend; realized trading flow, not true PnL (ignores still-held NFTs; wash trades inflate both sides).
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x439af5c4c2fbe2886ff0ccbd9abf036eaef8e0d6ac76f41168bc22661ba7146c",
"n_tx": 37,
"n_successful_tx": 37,
"n_distinct_epochs": 16,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 0,
"first_seen_cp": 21527847,
"last_seen_cp": 101106668,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1703225175124,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1736777365074,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 180411812,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 37,
"n_sponsored_tx": 0,
"gas_price_p50": 750,
"gas_price_p95": 750,
"active_hours_top24": [
4,
2,
8,
7,
15,
5,
6,
14,
0,
11,
12
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely E. / SE Asia.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail