all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x4c1c…7e6a wallet appears to be a casual NFT flipper, primarily listing and delisting NFTs on TradePort, with a side hustle of occasional spot DEX swaps. This wallet looks like a normal human collector, as its bot score is a pristine 0.00, indicating no suspicious automated activity. It's so legitimately boring, it's almost impressive.
marketplace NFT sales from analytics.sale. Net = proceeds − spend; realized trading flow, not true PnL (ignores still-held NFTs; wash trades inflate both sides).
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x4c1c37d712b1a7cfcc0c8c7fa6aab5a598f89237b6a500fc59044778198e7e6a",
"n_tx": 119,
"n_successful_tx": 117,
"n_distinct_epochs": 50,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 0,
"first_seen_cp": 3804374,
"last_seen_cp": 72734834,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1685427679748,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1729866063802,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 265029908,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 119,
"n_sponsored_tx": 0,
"gas_price_p50": 751,
"gas_price_p95": 758,
"active_hours_top24": [
14,
0,
5,
13,
12,
4,
11,
15,
2,
9,
1,
3,
8,
10,
6,
16,
18
],
"primary_archetype": null,
"labels": [],
"label_confidence": [],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely W/Central Asia / India.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail