all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x6578…3cf0 wallet appears to be a casual NFT user, having minted one NFT and listed another on Tradeport. With a bot score of 0.00 and no suspicious activity, this wallet is refreshingly human, perhaps even boringly legitimate.
marketplace NFT sales from analytics.sale. Net = proceeds − spend; realized trading flow, not true PnL (ignores still-held NFTs; wash trades inflate both sides).
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x65781eeb4aed2f327c5b4fbe7967e98c898b2f20ffdc469d3044240be2293cf0",
"n_tx": 6,
"n_successful_tx": 6,
"n_distinct_epochs": 4,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 0,
"first_seen_cp": 34657675,
"last_seen_cp": 207028613,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1716322078016,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1761919809058,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 26082568,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 6,
"n_sponsored_tx": 0,
"gas_price_p50": 495,
"gas_price_p95": 758,
"active_hours_top24": [
14,
12,
15,
20
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely UK / W. Europe / W. Africa.