all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x6883…50b6 wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a generic routing protocol, likely for token swaps, given the repeated calls to `router::swap_a_to_b_by_a` and `router::initiate_path_by_percent`. This wallet looks like a normal human user, as its bot score is a pristine 0.00, with no signals fired – a truly boringly legitimate on-chain presence.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x688308000850f0a17b45a92dd459ea324fc42a2945ee4bee7b2bdedc2ccd50b6",
"n_tx": 3,
"n_successful_tx": 3,
"n_distinct_epochs": 1,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 147002012,
"last_seen_cp": 147002101,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1747660656307,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1747660676634,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 10488624,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 2,
"n_sponsored_tx": 1,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 740,
"active_hours_top24": [
13
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.