all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x9755…92bb wallet appears to be a casual user, likely engaging in routine token swaps given the repeated calls to `router::swap_exact_input_` and `coin::value`. This wallet seems to be a model citizen of the Sui blockchain, showing no signs of automated or bot-like behavior, with a perfect 0.00 bot score and no suspicious activity signals. It's almost disappointingly legitimate.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x97558c528dc8ba0cf73823d1c965f0a37b68147d545af04db4a8b7f6ac5792bb",
"n_tx": 15,
"n_successful_tx": 15,
"n_distinct_epochs": 1,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 82131998,
"last_seen_cp": 82138238,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1732170200455,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1732171727878,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 33032360,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 10,
"n_sponsored_tx": 5,
"gas_price_p50": 750,
"gas_price_p95": 750,
"active_hours_top24": [
6
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.