all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0xa84d…4250 wallet appears to be a digital tumbleweed, showing almost no activity whatsoever. With a bot score of 0.00 and no discernible on-chain behavior, it's either a very patient HODLer or simply an abandoned address. This wallet looks like a normal human collector, albeit one who hasn't collected anything yet.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0xa84d78eaf82402360b2653c7239270b42afc59586c3a0ba1becac9640cc74250",
"n_tx": 2,
"n_successful_tx": 2,
"n_distinct_epochs": 2,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 0,
"first_seen_cp": 2978680,
"last_seen_cp": 3941990,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1684590565477,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1685566035654,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 1783064,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 2,
"n_sponsored_tx": 0,
"gas_price_p50": 830,
"gas_price_p95": 895,
"active_hours_top24": [
13,
20
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.