all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0xb02d…154d wallet appears to be a very quiet, almost comically inactive, bot that attempted two swaps via an unidentified router. Given its zero SUI holdings and minimal activity, it's either a bot that ran out of gas, or a very shy, very new, and very unsuccessful bot. Its bot score of 0.00, with no signals fired, suggests it's either incredibly stealthy or simply hasn't done enough to trigger any red flags.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
botcasualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0xb02d8d57125fb9259b213a1c8f68d5dc4d7ecf32df366b47d850697d690f154d",
"n_tx": 3,
"n_successful_tx": 3,
"n_distinct_epochs": 1,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 67700654,
"last_seen_cp": 67700694,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1728627068739,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1728627078320,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 4789768,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 0,
"n_sponsored_tx": 3,
"gas_price_p50": 750,
"gas_price_p95": 750,
"active_hours_top24": [
6
],
"primary_archetype": "bot",
"labels": [
"bot",
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
1,
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.