all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0xbb2d…e264 wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a routing service, likely for token swaps, given the repeated calls to `router::initiate_path_by_percent`, `end_router_tx`, and `begin_router_tx_and_collect_fees`. This wallet is remarkably boringly legitimate, with no bot signals, wash trades, or sybil activity detected.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0xbb2de5483f66bbbb5cb625be1386b630178a003d7d8f851a77cbe82ff8f2e264",
"n_tx": 9,
"n_successful_tx": 9,
"n_distinct_epochs": 2,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 140718974,
"last_seen_cp": 143527746,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1746241099013,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1746883854776,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 17274896,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 6,
"n_sponsored_tx": 3,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 740,
"active_hours_top24": [
2,
5,
13
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.