all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0xc26b…a4c6 wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a routing service, likely for token swaps, given the repeated calls to `router::initiate_path_by_percent`, `swap_b_to_a_by_b`, and `swap_a_to_b_by_a`. This wallet is remarkably boring, showing no signs of automation, wash trading, or any other bot-like shenanigans, with a perfect 0.00 bot score. It's almost as if a human is actually using it.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0xc26b58eeb209441219cf88713dc48568f271fe1789afbb26e0a70c7d9daba4c6",
"n_tx": 3,
"n_successful_tx": 3,
"n_distinct_epochs": 1,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 147421069,
"last_seen_cp": 147421390,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1747755475778,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1747755546759,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 10844696,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 2,
"n_sponsored_tx": 1,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 740,
"active_hours_top24": [
15
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.