all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0xc634…eede wallet appears to be a rather mundane NFT collector, primarily engaging in bidding and claiming activities, likely from some kind of farming or staking protocol. It dabbles in NFTs, buying and selling a few across different marketplaces, but its SUI holdings are nonexistent, suggesting it's not a major player. This wallet looks like a perfectly normal human, exhibiting no signs of automation or bot-like behavior; it's almost disappointingly legitimate.
marketplace NFT sales from analytics.sale. Net = proceeds − spend; realized trading flow, not true PnL (ignores still-held NFTs; wash trades inflate both sides).
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0xc6341414590c4278dfe4105bf55d4863643fb5ccb820c43f281fd36e1f06eede",
"n_tx": 100,
"n_successful_tx": 100,
"n_distinct_epochs": 21,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 0,
"first_seen_cp": 20666023,
"last_seen_cp": 143715420,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1702368475862,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1746926871706,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 316768312,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 100,
"n_sponsored_tx": 0,
"gas_price_p50": 750,
"gas_price_p95": 754,
"active_hours_top24": [
3,
1,
19,
13,
6,
8,
14,
4,
10,
9,
2,
17,
15,
18
],
"primary_archetype": null,
"labels": [],
"label_confidence": [],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
Top active hours by UTC. Flat around the clock → no timezone signal (likely automated).
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail