all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0xda6f…dbdf wallet appears to be a very quiet, almost comically inactive, bot. Its entire on-chain existence revolves around two calls to a generic "router::swap_exact_input" function, suggesting it's a dormant or very early-stage trading bot that hasn't found its groove yet. With a bot score of 0.00 and no other suspicious signals, this bot is either incredibly stealthy or just really, really bad at its job.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
botcasualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0xda6f229f88a35dca21c307a2c2ceb32a3b1014b1d4e13eeefd4423596887dbdf",
"n_tx": 3,
"n_successful_tx": 3,
"n_distinct_epochs": 1,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 1,
"first_seen_cp": 70547917,
"last_seen_cp": 70547945,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1729326207709,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1729326214351,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 4789768,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 0,
"n_sponsored_tx": 3,
"gas_price_p50": 750,
"gas_price_p95": 750,
"active_hours_top24": [
8
],
"primary_archetype": "bot",
"labels": [
"bot",
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
1,
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC.