#156 by volume#324 by sales#312 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)
metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.
demand & order book
Weak / thin demand
Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).
wash volume
0%
same-NFT round-trips
bid cancel
0.9×
537 cancelled / 584 created
offers accepted
2%
sales meeting real demand
sales / buyer
2.1
98 buyers
bid activity over time all-time
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-06 17:38:14 UTC
Bluemove Launchpad has tracked volume of 5,586 SUI, though recent activity is low with 0 SUI in the last 7 days and only 1 SUI in the last 30 days, indicating a current pause in trading compared to typical top collections. The collection's top-10 holder concentration at 54% is more concentrated than the typical top collection's 26%, while its 9% bot-flagged holders is in line with peer medians. A genuine strength is its 0.0% wash-traded volume, which is significantly lower than the typical 0.1% for top collections, suggesting organic trading activity when sales do occur.
signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below
•Top 10 holders currently hold 54% of traded supply
•9% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history
wash rateall tracked
0.0%
0 SUI washed
holder conc.current
54%
top-10 share of supply
bot holderscurrent
9%
score ≥ 0.30
volume7d
0
— vs prior 7d
volume30d
1 SUI
trailing 30d
velocity7d
0
sales / 7d
tracked volume 5.6k SUItop funder fan-out 96 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-06
supply & profit-taking
3%of held supply underwater
3% of the 4,172 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)
2.9 SUI
floor (robust)
0 SUI
median cost
4,172
held
<0.5×
4,064
0.5–1×
1
1–1.5×
8
1.5–2×
2
2–3×
3
3–5×
10
5×+
84
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
sweep cost depth
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
floor 2.7 SUIlisted 71 / 4,173 (1.7%) real sweep floor × n
bid wall depth
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
47 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.1–2 SUI (7 bids) collection single
sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
4.2dmedian hold before sale
3.8h
p10 (fastest flips)
8mo
p90
91
sales measured
6
<1h
15
1-24h
30
1-7d
17
7-30d
4
30-90d
14
90-365d
5
>365d
minted/airdropped (4) bought secondary (87)
listing duration · sold vs cancelled
How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.
4mo
median to sale
23d
median to cancel
35
completed listings
2
<1h
1
1-24h
4
1-7d
8
7-30d
8
30-90d
12
>90d
sold cancelled relisted
demand authenticity — funding sources all-time
92% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
■ organic 90■ mid 3■ manufactured 098 of 98 buyers have a known first-funder
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
tracked sales
206
volume
5,586 SUI
distinct buyers
97
117 sellers
distinct NFTs traded
119
price distribution all-time
p10
3.13 SUI
p50 (median)
23.10 SUI
p90
45.00 SUI
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
marketplace mix (top 5) all-time
bluemove
40.0%
tradeport
30.0%
souffl3
20.0%
mermaidplace
10.0%
activity window
first sale
2023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC
last activity
2026-05-30 19:51:51 UTC
holder whale-map current holders
top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 56 holders across 117 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
holder accumulation ribbon all-time
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 19 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
mint-snipe timeline launch window
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
120 launch-window saleswindow 23d1 sniper-flip
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
shared user base all-time
collections most-bought by this collection's 98 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 98 total buyers.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 0 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.
no wash round-trips detected — no NFT in this collection sold A→B then back B→A.
Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.
first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d
Top 13 first-week buyers netted 523 SUI flipping in.