live · collection summary

Bored Ape Sui Club

0xcc2650b0d0b949e9cf4da71c22377fcbb78d71ce9cf0fed3e724ed3e2dc57813::boredapesuiclub_collection::BoredApeSuiClub

#33 by volume#30 by sales#146 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Weak / thin demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.8×

3,590 cancelled / 4,301 created

offers accepted

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

5.3

1,447 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-05 18:34:32 UTC

The Boredapesuiclub Collection has seen a total tracked volume of 106,730 SUI, though recent activity is absent with no sales in the last 7 or 30 days. Its top-10 holder concentration at 19% is less concentrated than the typical top collection's 26%, suggesting a broader distribution among its 877 current traded holders. Furthermore, the collection exhibits a lower percentage of bot-flagged holders (6%) and wash-traded volume (0.3%) compared to typical top collections, indicating a relatively organic trading environment.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history

wash rateall tracked

0.3%

326 SUI washed

holder conc.current

13%

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

— vs prior 7d

volume30d

0 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 106.7k SUItop funder fan-out 3064 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-10

supply & profit-taking

83%of held supply underwater

83% of the 4,996 secondary-bought · 4 minted (cost-unknown)

0.3 SUI

floor (robust)

7 SUI

median cost

5,000

held

<0.5×

822

0.5–1×

1.5–2×

2–3×

3–5×

5×+

4,108

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

sweep cost depth

Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.

floor 0.28 SUIlisted 274 / 5,000 (5.5%) real sweep floor × n

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

705 active bidscollection-bid wall at 7–8 SUI (86 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

85%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 6,509 sell 1,184

seller hold time · flip speed

How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.

8.5dmedian hold before sale

1.5h

p10 (fastest flips)

7mo

p90

3,715

sales measured

314

<1h

753

1-24h

725

1-7d

519

7-30d

483

30-90d

847

90-365d

>365d

minted/airdropped (22) bought secondary (3,693)

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

36h

median to sale

41h

median to cancel

1,536

completed listings

339

<1h

281

1-24h

371

1-7d

266

7-30d

174

30-90d

105

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

86% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic

■ organic 1,239■ mid 79■ manufactured 01,447 of 1,447 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

7,693

volume

106,730 SUI

distinct buyers

1,451

1,577 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

3,545

price distribution all-time

p10: 3.57 SUI
p50 (median): 10.00 SUI
p90: 25.00 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

tocen
33.3%
bluemove
26.7%
tradeport
20.0%
souffl3
13.3%
mermaidplace
6.7%

activity window

first sale: 2023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2026-05-12 13:20:55 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 41 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 15m1 sniper-flip

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 1,447 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

Bored Ape Pixels Club

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 1,447 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 12 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

1
0x5f99d…f5c1d⇄0xadb39…edaf08 NFTs cycled
132 round-trips · 962.35 SUI
2
0xadb39…edaf0⇄0xc6656…5d2072 NFTs cycled
2 round-trips · 14.01 SUI
3
0x3d887…a9e51⇄0x44ada…e612b1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 0.0110 SUI
4
0x2950b…02bd7⇄0xc522e…4481e1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 13.30 SUI
5
0x1b934…1cc5a⇄0x91f1c…2ac331 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 144.99 SUI
6
0x2950b…02bd7⇄0x420fc…b8f5d1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 7.69 SUI

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 13,562 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).