all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
cumulative SUI vs % of supply
active bids by price
buyer funding sources
rank over time · top holders
median sale by trait value
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
Mad Hopperz has tracked volume of 227 SUI, with no sales in the last 30 days, which is below the typical activity for top collections. The collection has 51 current traded holders, but its top-10 holder concentration at 60% is significantly more concentrated than the typical top collection's 26%, and its 20% bot-flagged holders are also above the typical 9%. A genuine strength is its 0.0% wash-traded volume, which is well below the typical 0.1% for top collections.
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
81% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
tradeportkiosk_mkttop holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 14 weeks.
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
collections most-bought by this collection's 59 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
each cell is a trait value, colored by its median sale price vs the collection median (0 SUI) — green = premium, rose = discount. Traits ranked by how much their best value beats the floor. Reveals which traits actually drive value.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 59 total buyers.
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 0 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.
Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.
Median sale price per trait value (≥5 sales each).
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.