live · collection summary

Squid Key

0xd2197b1ce2096e96e726c29fa2c138c5c6748da169b81d34927c522b7499f1d7::squid_key::SquidKey

#59 by volume#8 by sales#258 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Organic demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.5×

11,572 cancelled / 24,585 created

offers accepted

32%

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

6.5

5,982 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-07 12:48:06 UTC

Squid Key's historical traded volume of 51,987 SUI is a notable figure, though recent activity shows no sales in the last 7 or 30 days, indicating a current pause in market movement. With 5,642 current traded holders, its top-10 holder concentration at 13% is considerably less concentrated than the typical top collection's 26%, suggesting a more distributed ownership base. Furthermore, the collection exhibits a lower percentage of bot-flagged holders at 6% compared to the typical 9%, and a wash-traded volume of 0.0% is significantly below the typical 0.1%, highlighting a clean trading history.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

•Volume down 100% in the last 7d vs the prior week
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history

wash rateall tracked

0.0%

17 SUI washed

holder conc.current

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

▼ 100% vs prior 7d

volume30d

0 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 52.0k SUItracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-10

supply & profit-taking

13%of held supply underwater

13% of the 220,533 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)

0.8 SUI

floor (robust)

0 SUI

median cost

220,533

held

<0.5×

188,176

0.5–1×

3,459

1–1.5×

19,091

1.5–2×

4,436

2–3×

2,223

3–5×

1,576

5×+

1,572

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

sweep cost depth

Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.

floor 0.20 SUIlisted 631 / 220,533 (0.3%) real sweep floor × n

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

13,013 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.7–1 SUI (6,902 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

68%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 26,300 sell 12,614

seller hold time · flip speed

How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.

9.5hmedian hold before sale

p10 (fastest flips)

13d

p90

31,783

sales measured

10,098

<1h

8,530

1-24h

7,277

1-7d

4,425

7-30d

1,265

30-90d

188

90-365d

>365d

minted/airdropped (25,553) bought secondary (6,230)

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

1.1h

median to sale

4.8h

median to cancel

44,478

completed listings

20,017

<1h

15,575

1-24h

6,941

1-7d

1,771

7-30d

144

30-90d

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

mixed / inconclusive funding

■ organic 0■ mid 0■ manufactured 00 of 5,982 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

38,914

volume

51,987 SUI

distinct buyers

6,162

10,853 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

33,259

price distribution all-time

p10: 0.7147 SUI
p50 (median): 1.02 SUI
p90: 2.20 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

tradeport
66.7%
kiosk_mkt
33.3%

activity window

first sale: 2025-03-07 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2026-05-31 10:46:02 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 16 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 3.1h1 sniper-flip

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 5,982 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

Mystic Yeti Pass Whitelist Gold

274 shared · 5%

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 5,982 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 5 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

1
0x61789…bdf08⇄0xc5f6b…24b372 NFTs cycled
2 round-trips · 17.94 SUI
2
0x61594…2d8b0⇄0x6a9b1…b0baa1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 5.10 SUI
3
0x48e61…9ffe3⇄0x99347…eb1231 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 1.58 SUI
4
0x0db65…1cd56⇄0xda843…c9e6c1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 3.32 SUI

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 2,062 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).