#331 by volume#305 by sales#24 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)
metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.
demand & order book
Weak / thin demand
Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).
wash volume
13%
same-NFT round-trips
bid cancel
0.8×
328 cancelled / 388 created
offers accepted
15%
sales meeting real demand
sales / buyer
5.8
42 buyers
bid activity over time all-time
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-06 16:18:38 UTC
Slimez> exhibits a tracked volume of 529 SUI, with no recent sales activity over the past 30 days, indicating a current pause in market movement. The collection's holder distribution is more concentrated than typical, with the top 10 holders accounting for 68% of the supply, and it also shows a slightly higher percentage of bot-flagged holders at 12%. Notably, Slimez> has a significantly higher proportion of wash-traded volume compared to typical top collections, though its largest single first-funder fan-out of 11 buyers suggests some organic initial interest.
signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below
⚠13% of all tracked volume is wash-traded (27 round-trip sales)
⚠Top 10 holders (same-operator wallets combined) hold 68% of supply — highly concentrated
•12% of current holders are flagged bots
wash rateall tracked
13%
68 SUI washed
holder conc.current
68%
top-10 share of supply
bot holderscurrent
12%
score ≥ 0.30
volume7d
0
— vs prior 7d
volume30d
0 SUI
trailing 30d
velocity7d
0
sales / 7d
tracked volume 529 SUItop funder fan-out 44 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-09
supply & profit-taking
29%of held supply underwater
29% of the 82 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)
2.8 SUI
floor (robust)
0.4 SUI
median cost
82
held
<0.5×
55
0.5–1×
1
1–1.5×
6
1.5–2×
8
2–3×
4
3–5×
2
5×+
6
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
sweep cost depth
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
Not enough active listings to chart a sweep curve.
bid wall depth
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
60 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.3–0.5 SUI (23 bids) collection single
sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
1.5hmedian hold before sale
19m
p10 (fastest flips)
4.9d
p90
144
sales measured
59
<1h
69
1-24h
2
1-7d
2
7-30d
3
30-90d
9
90-365d
>365d
minted/airdropped (0) bought secondary (144)
listing duration · sold vs cancelled
How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.
—
median to sale
68d
median to cancel
3
completed listings
1
<1h
1-24h
1-7d
7-30d
2
30-90d
>90d
sold cancelled relisted
demand authenticity — funding sources all-time
98% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
■ organic 41■ mid 0■ manufactured 042 of 42 buyers have a known first-funder
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
tracked sales
242
volume
529.03 SUI
distinct buyers
42
63 sellers
distinct NFTs traded
82
price distribution all-time
p10
0.0800 SUI
p50 (median)
0.5050 SUI
p90
5.29 SUI
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
marketplace mix (top 5) all-time
mermaidplace
40.0%
bluemove
30.0%
kiosk_mkt
20.0%
tradeport
10.0%
activity window
first sale
2023-05-09 00:00:00 UTC
last activity
2026-05-17 13:09:36 UTC
holder whale-map current holders
top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 34 holders across 82 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
holder accumulation ribbon all-time
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 35 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
mint-snipe timeline launch window
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
120 launch-window saleswindow 181d44 sniper-flips
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
shared user base all-time
collections most-bought by this collection's 42 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 42 total buyers.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 6 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.