#247 by volume#270 by sales#25 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)
metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.
demand & order book
Direct-buy market
Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).
wash volume
12%
same-NFT round-trips
bid cancel
—
171 cancelled · no bids created in window
offers accepted
0%
sales meeting real demand
sales / buyer
7.8
43 buyers
bid activity over time all-time
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-06 16:21:06 UTC
MDC> has a total tracked volume of 1,842 SUI, but recent trading activity is notably absent with zero sales in the last 30 days, indicating a current lack of market engagement. The collection exhibits a higher concentration of ownership, with the top 10 holders controlling 67% of the supply, which is significantly above the typical top collection's 26%. Furthermore, the collection shows a higher percentage of bot-flagged holders at 12% and a substantial 11.7% of its volume attributed to wash trading, both metrics being considerably above typical peer medians.
signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below
⚠12% of all tracked volume is wash-traded (54 round-trip sales)
⚠Top 10 holders currently control 67% of traded supply — highly concentrated
•12% of current holders are flagged bots
wash rateall tracked
12%
216 SUI washed
holder conc.current
67%
top-10 share of supply
bot holderscurrent
12%
score ≥ 0.30
volume7d
0
— vs prior 7d
volume30d
0 SUI
trailing 30d
velocity7d
0
sales / 7d
tracked volume 1.8k SUItop funder fan-out 28 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-06
supply & profit-taking
42%of held supply underwater
42% of the 48 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)
7.5 SUI
floor (robust)
1.5 SUI
median cost
48
held
<0.5×
25
0.5–1×
3
1–1.5×
3
1.5–2×
9
2–3×
6
5×+
2
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
sweep cost depth
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
Not enough active listings to chart a sweep curve.
bid wall depth
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
20 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.1–0.5 SUI (7 bids) collection single
sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
50mmedian hold before sale
12m
p10 (fastest flips)
2.5d
p90
262
sales measured
151
<1h
80
1-24h
7
1-7d
6
7-30d
10
30-90d
5
90-365d
3
>365d
minted/airdropped (0) bought secondary (262)
listing duration · sold vs cancelled
How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.
—
median to sale
63d
median to cancel
3
completed listings
1
<1h
1-24h
1-7d
7-30d
2
30-90d
>90d
sold cancelled relisted
demand authenticity — funding sources all-time
91% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
■ organic 39■ mid 2■ manufactured 043 of 43 buyers have a known first-funder
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
tracked sales
337
volume
1,842 SUI
distinct buyers
43
51 sellers
distinct NFTs traded
48
price distribution all-time
p10
0.0700 SUI
p50 (median)
1.09 SUI
p90
14.00 SUI
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
marketplace mix (top 5) all-time
mermaidplace
50.0%
bluemove
33.3%
tradeport
16.7%
activity window
first sale
2023-05-05 00:00:00 UTC
last activity
2026-05-12 16:55:42 UTC
holder whale-map current holders
top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 26 holders across 48 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
holder accumulation ribbon all-time
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 15 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
mint-snipe timeline launch window
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
120 launch-window saleswindow 189d28 sniper-flips
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
shared user base all-time
collections most-bought by this collection's 43 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 43 total buyers.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 10 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.