#271 by volume#189 by sales#353 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)
metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.
demand & order book
Suspicious demand
Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).
wash volume
0%
same-NFT round-trips
bid cancel
0.9×
3,189 cancelled / 3,656 created
offers accepted
0%
sales meeting real demand
sales / buyer
16.6
38 buyers
bid activity over time all-time
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-05 20:37:08 UTC
The Captains Loot has a modest tracked volume of 1,266 SUI, with no recent sales activity in the last 30 days, which is below the typical top collection's consistent trading. Its 35 current traded holders are more concentrated than usual, with the top 10 holders accounting for 79% of the collection, significantly higher than the typical 26%. While the collection shows a higher percentage of bot-flagged holders at 29% compared to the typical 9%, a genuine strength is its 0.0% wash-traded volume, indicating a clean trading history relative to peers.
signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below
⚠Top 10 holders currently control 79% of traded supply — highly concentrated
⚠29% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history
wash rateall tracked
0.0%
0 SUI washed
holder conc.current
79%
top-10 share of supply
bot holderscurrent
29%
score ≥ 0.30
volume7d
0
— vs prior 7d
volume30d
0 SUI
trailing 30d
velocity7d
0
sales / 7d
tracked volume 1.3k SUItop funder fan-out 106 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-06
supply & profit-taking
10%of held supply underwater
10% of the 5,500 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)
0.1 SUI
floor (robust)
0 SUI
median cost
5,500
held
<0.5×
4,925
0.5–1×
4
1–1.5×
2
1.5–2×
1
2–3×
2
3–5×
3
5×+
563
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
sweep cost depth
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
floor 0.10 SUIlisted 170 / 5,500 (3.1%) real sweep floor × n
bid wall depth
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
467 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.1–0.5 SUI (0 bids) collection single
sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
6.5dmedian hold before sale
11h
p10 (fastest flips)
23d
p90
310
sales measured
8
<1h
43
1-24h
111
1-7d
138
7-30d
10
30-90d
90-365d
>365d
minted/airdropped (259) bought secondary (51)
listing duration · sold vs cancelled
How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.
—
median to sale
20d
median to cancel
8
completed listings
<1h
1-24h
1-7d
8
7-30d
30-90d
>90d
sold cancelled relisted
demand authenticity — funding sources all-time
89% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
■ organic 34■ mid 4■ manufactured 038 of 38 buyers have a known first-funder
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
tracked sales
630
volume
1,266 SUI
distinct buyers
38
95 sellers
distinct NFTs traded
573
price distribution all-time
p10
0.8010 SUI
p50 (median)
1.52 SUI
p90
5.00 SUI
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
marketplace mix (top 5) all-time
tradeport
100.0%
activity window
first sale
2025-11-12 00:00:00 UTC
last activity
2026-03-30 10:31:33 UTC
holder whale-map current holders
top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 35 holders across 577 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
holder accumulation ribbon all-time
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 7 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
mint-snipe timeline launch window
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
120 launch-window saleswindow 7d
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
shared user base all-time
collections most-bought by this collection's 38 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 38 total buyers.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 0 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.
no wash round-trips detected — no NFT in this collection sold A→B then back B→A.
Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.
first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d
Top 8 first-week buyers netted 26 SUI flipping in.