live · collection summary

Mystic Yeti Pass Whitelist Gold

0xb07b09b016d28f989b6adda8069096da0c0a0ff6490f6e0866858c023b061bee::mint::WhitelistPass

#104 by volume#80 by sales#222 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Organic demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.6×

1,633 cancelled / 2,807 created

offers accepted

42%

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

2.5

1,106 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-07 06:53:04 UTC

Mint's tracked volume of 14,066 SUI is notable, though its recent sales activity is currently below typical, with no recorded sales in the last 30 days. The collection demonstrates a lower top-10 holder concentration at 14% compared to the typical 26%, suggesting a more distributed ownership, despite a slightly elevated bot-flagged holder percentage of 12% against a typical 9%. Its wash-traded volume of 0.1% aligns perfectly with the typical top collection, indicating healthy trading integrity.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

⚠One wallet first-funded 935 of this collection's buyers and funds almost nothing else (0 collections) — possible coordinated funding
•12% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history

wash rateall tracked

0.1%

12 SUI washed

holder conc.current

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

12%

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

— vs prior 7d

volume30d

0 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 14.1k SUItop funder fan-out 935 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-09

supply & profit-taking

11%of held supply underwater

11% of the 14,813 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)

0.2 SUI

floor (robust)

0 SUI

median cost

14,813

held

<0.5×

13,088

0.5–1×

1–1.5×

1.5–2×

2–3×

3–5×

5×+

1,528

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

sweep cost depth

Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.

floor 0.10 SUIlisted 109 / 14,813 (0.7%) real sweep floor × n

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

1,174 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.0–0.8 SUI (289 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

58%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 1,584 sell 1,167

seller hold time · flip speed

How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.

5.8hmedian hold before sale

p10 (fastest flips)

22h

p90

2,751

sales measured

615

<1h

1,892

1-24h

192

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

90-365d

>365d

minted/airdropped (1,765) bought secondary (986)

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

median to sale

42m

median to cancel

2,169

completed listings

1,622

<1h

458

1-24h

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

73% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic

■ organic 811■ mid 74■ manufactured 01,104 of 1,106 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

2,751

volume

14,066 SUI

distinct buyers

1,094

1,785 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

1,773

price distribution all-time

p10: 0.4809 SUI
p50 (median): 5.12 SUI
p90: 9.63 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

tradeport
100.0%

activity window

first sale: 2025-04-22 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2026-04-25 23:19:21 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 2 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 1.3h11 sniper-flips

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 1,106 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

ADIDAS X XOCIETY COLLECTION

91 shared · 8%

Suins Registration

91 shared · 8%

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 1,106 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 4 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

1
0x122e3…f5b33⇄0xbdca0…0f2e61 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 1.47 SUI
2
0xa6482…d27e1⇄0xe56ad…3ac111 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 6.55 SUI
3
0x0ccb8…6707c⇄0xd87a5…080f01 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 4.40 SUI
4
0x19ecd…a63da⇄0xec423…323d31 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 7.05 SUI

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 469 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).