all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
cumulative SUI vs % of supply
active bids by price
buyer funding sources
rank over time · top holders
median sale by trait value
My Minter's tracked volume of 14 SUI is below the typical top collection, with no recent sales activity in the last 30 days. The collection exhibits a significantly higher holder concentration, with 100% held by the top 10, compared to a typical 26%, though it benefits from zero bot-flagged holders and no wash-traded volume, which are both favorable compared to peer medians. The single first-funder fan-out suggests a very limited initial distribution.
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.
100% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
bluemovetradeporttop holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 2 holders across 7 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 2 holders across 2 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
collections most-bought by this collection's 2 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 2 total buyers.
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 0 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.
Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.
Top 20 NFTs by sale count.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.