live · collection summary

Sui Trident

0x84a87eae56833bd7651129aacf9e94e815a767d0968dedcefc2dfd7a26e09971::suinews_collection::SuiTrident

#136 by volume#83 by sales#273 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Weak / thin demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.7×

244 cancelled / 329 created

offers accepted

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

2.2

1,192 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-05 18:32:11 UTC

The Suinews Collection's tracked volume of 8,519 SUI is a notable strength, though the absence of recent sales volume suggests a current pause in market activity. Its holder concentration at 13% is significantly lower than the typical top collection, indicating a more distributed ownership base, while bot-flagged holders are in line with peer medians. The collection also demonstrates excellent market integrity with 0.0% wash-traded volume, and its largest single first-funder fan-out of 283 buyers points to a broad initial reach.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

•8% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history

wash rateall tracked

0.0%

1 SUI washed

holder conc.current

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

— vs prior 7d

volume30d

0 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 8.5k SUItop funder fan-out 862 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-09

supply & profit-taking

76%of held supply underwater

76% of the 9,976 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)

0.2 SUI

floor (robust)

5 SUI

median cost

9,976

held

<0.5×

2,324

0.5–1×

1–1.5×

1.5–2×

2–3×

3–5×

186

5×+

7,232

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

sweep cost depth

Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.

floor 0.07 SUIlisted 521 / 9,977 (5.2%) real sweep floor × n

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

80 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.0–0.3 SUI (23 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

89%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 2,336 sell 303

seller hold time · flip speed

How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.

10hmedian hold before sale

p10 (fastest flips)

62d

p90

850

sales measured

234

<1h

306

1-24h

124

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

90-365d

>365d

minted/airdropped (12) bought secondary (838)

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

1.5h

median to sale

2.6h

median to cancel

320

completed listings

126

<1h

117

1-24h

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

81% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic

■ organic 960■ mid 64■ manufactured 141,192 of 1,192 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

2,639

volume

8,519 SUI

distinct buyers

1,174

1,295 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

1,787

price distribution all-time

p10: 0.2000 SUI
p50 (median): 2.42 SUI
p90: 6.79 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

tocen
40.0%
bluemove
30.0%
souffl3
20.0%
tradeport
10.0%

activity window

first sale: 2023-05-05 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2025-08-23 16:08:46 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 52 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 13m3 sniper-flips

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 1,192 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

Bored Ape Pixels Club

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 1,192 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 2 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

1
0xaaada…f532f⇄0xd77b7…1a0672 NFTs cycled
2 round-trips · 2.50 SUI

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 410 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).