#105 by volume#43 by sales#94 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)
metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.
demand & order book
Organic demand
Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).
wash volume
1%
same-NFT round-trips
bid cancel
0.7×
3,368 cancelled / 4,733 created
offers accepted
23%
sales meeting real demand
sales / buyer
5.3
961 buyers
bid activity over time all-time
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-08 11:10:47 UTC
The Chillcats Collection, with 13,892 SUI in tracked historical volume, currently shows no 7-day volume and only 2 SUI in 30-day volume, indicating a recent slowdown in trading activity compared to typical top collections. Its holder concentration, with the top 10 holders owning 45% of the collection, is more concentrated than the typical top collection's 26%, while its 9% bot-flagged holders are in line with peer medians. The collection's 0.7% wash-traded volume is above the typical 0.1% but below the 90th percentile for top collections, and its largest single first-funder fan-out to 219 buyers suggests a broad initial distribution.
signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below
⚠Top 10 holders (same-operator wallets combined) hold 31% of supply — highly concentrated
⚠One wallet first-funded 452 of this collection's buyers and funds almost nothing else (0 collections) — possible coordinated funding
•9% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history
wash rateall tracked
0.7%
102 SUI washed
holder conc.current
31%
top-10 share of supply
bot holderscurrent
9%
score ≥ 0.30
volume7d
0
— vs prior 7d
volume30d
1 SUI
trailing 30d
velocity7d
0
sales / 7d
tracked volume 13.9k SUItop funder fan-out 452 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-10
supply & profit-taking
33%of held supply underwater
33% of the 3,637 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)
1.8 SUI
floor (robust)
0.5 SUI
median cost
3,637
held
<0.5×
2,024
0.5–1×
395
1–1.5×
318
1.5–2×
209
2–3×
306
3–5×
130
5×+
255
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
sweep cost depth
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
floor 1 SUIlisted 165 / 3,637 (4.5%) real sweep floor × n
bid wall depth
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
1,365 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.0–0.7 SUI (379 bids) collection single
sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
11dmedian hold before sale
3m
p10 (fastest flips)
15mo
p90
2,858
sales measured
561
<1h
256
1-24h
473
1-7d
411
7-30d
259
30-90d
513
90-365d
385
>365d
minted/airdropped (720) bought secondary (2,138)
listing duration · sold vs cancelled
How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.
2.7d
median to sale
3.9d
median to cancel
1,702
completed listings
133
<1h
409
1-24h
465
1-7d
278
7-30d
206
30-90d
211
>90d
sold cancelled relisted
demand authenticity — funding sources all-time
84% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
■ organic 803■ mid 70■ manufactured 0961 of 961 buyers have a known first-funder
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
tracked sales
5,047
volume
13,892 SUI
distinct buyers
958
1,810 sellers
distinct NFTs traded
2,555
price distribution all-time
p10
0.2500 SUI
p50 (median)
1.00 SUI
p90
7.79 SUI
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
marketplace mix (top 5) all-time
tradeport
40.0%
bluemove
30.0%
tocen
20.0%
souffl3
10.0%
activity window
first sale
2023-05-09 00:00:00 UTC
last activity
2026-05-24 02:45:19 UTC
holder whale-map current holders
top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 560 holders across 2,514 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
holder accumulation ribbon all-time
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 66 weeks.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
mint-snipe timeline launch window
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
120 launch-window saleswindow 11d2 sniper-flips
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
shared user base all-time
collections most-bought by this collection's 961 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 961 total buyers.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 27 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.