live · collection summary

Double Up Citizen

0x862810efecf0296db2e9df3e075a7af8034ba374e73ff1098e88cc4bb7c15437::doubleup_citizens::DoubleUpCitizen

#27 by volume#70 by sales#183 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Organic demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.8×

8,580 cancelled / 10,240 created

offers accepted

30%

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

4.1

824 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-09 00:45:27 UTC

Doubleup Citizens' all-time tracked volume of 190,918 SUI is a notable figure, though recent activity shows a complete absence of sales in the last seven days, indicating a current pause in trading compared to typical top collections. The collection exhibits a slightly more concentrated holder base with its top-10 holders owning 32% of the supply, modestly above the typical 26% for peer collections, while bot-flagged holders are largely in line with the median at 10%. A genuine strength is its remarkably low wash-traded volume at 0.2%, which is only marginally above the typical 0.1% and significantly below the 90th percentile, suggesting a healthy organic trading environment when active.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

⚠One wallet first-funded 1055 of this collection's buyers and funds almost nothing else (0 collections) — possible coordinated funding
•Top 10 holders hold 16% of supply
•10% of current holders are flagged bots
•Volume down 100% in the last 7d vs the prior week

wash rateall tracked

0.2%

341 SUI washed

holder conc.current

16%

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

10%

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

▼ 100% vs prior 7d

volume30d

64 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 190.9k SUItop funder fan-out 1055 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-09

supply & profit-taking

81%of held supply underwater

81% of the 2,888 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)

2.5 SUI

floor (robust)

46.4 SUI

median cost

2,888

held

<0.5×

525

0.5–1×

1–1.5×

1.5–2×

2–3×

3–5×

5×+

2,181

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

1,660 active bidscollection-bid wall at 51–57 SUI (136 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

61%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 2,088 sell 1,325

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

4.9h

median to sale

1.7h

median to cancel

10,416

completed listings

4,321

<1h

3,778

1-24h

1,564

1-7d

534

7-30d

165

30-90d

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

81% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic

■ organic 664■ mid 77■ manufactured 0823 of 824 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

3,413

volume

190,918 SUI

distinct buyers

820

1,114 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

1,501

price distribution all-time

p10: 10.33 SUI
p50 (median): 48.97 SUI
p90: 95.82 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

tradeport
50.0%
kiosk_mkt
33.3%
bluemove
16.7%

activity window

first sale: 2024-10-02 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2026-06-05 17:52:12 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 39 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 22.1h

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 824 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 824 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 10 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

1
0x8c575…f4c82⇄0x8ded4…451aa1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 6.10 SUI
2
0x4d591…8b038⇄0xdfdc1…592331 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 2.60 SUI
3
0x86a38…2e04d⇄0xdfdc1…592331 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 2.25 SUI
4
0x0db65…1cd56⇄0x76950…678cc1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 9.71 SUI
5
0x0200c…64636⇄0xb0e5b…337ed1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 158.84 SUI
6
0xb9109…15eba⇄0xd33fb…52d421 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 131.29 SUI
7
0x92af2…2af94⇄0xd4a42…5de301 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 72.17 SUI
8
0x1046b…f624b⇄0xabb3a…25fc01 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 131.78 SUI
9
0x92af2…2af94⇄0xe6b68…377e71 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 75.33 SUI
10
0x0db65…1cd56⇄0xc47bc…b0c671 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 32.54 SUI

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 20,337 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).