all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
cumulative SUI vs % of supply
active bids by price
buyer funding sources
rank over time · top holders
median sale by trait value
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
The Karafuru Collection's tracked volume of 156 SUI is below typical for top collections, with no recent sales activity in the past 30 days. Its holder concentration is significantly higher than typical, with 100% held by the top 10, and the percentage of bot-flagged holders is also elevated compared to peers. However, a genuine strength is its 0.0% wash-traded volume, which is well below the typical top collection.
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
57% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
bluemovetradeporttocensouffl3top holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 4 holders across 11 traded NFTs.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 4 holders across 5 weeks.
the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.
collections most-bought by this collection's 7 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 7 total buyers.
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair.
Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.
Top 3 first-week buyers netted 86 SUI flipping in.
First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.
First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.
Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.
Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).