all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
cumulative SUI vs % of supply
active bids by price
buyer funding sources
rank over time · top holders
median sale by trait value
Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.
Suia's historical volume of 623 SUI is in line with many emerging collections, though its recent lack of sales activity suggests a current pause in market interest. Holder concentration at 37% is more concentrated than the typical top collection, and the 13% bot-flagged holders are also above average, indicating a potentially less organic distribution. While wash-traded volume at 1.1% is higher than the typical top collection, it remains within the 90th percentile for some peer groups, and the collection demonstrates a genuine strength in its broad initial distribution, evidenced by 87 buyers from a single first-funder fan-out.
Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.
Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.
Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.
How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.
quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.
bluemovesouffl3tocentradeporttop holders by NFTs held (current holder = latest sale's buyer — the human, not the kiosk). Area = holdings; rose = automation bot, amber = suspected wash, sky = other. 324 holders across 893 traded NFTs.
how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 17 weeks.
collections most-bought by this collection's 340 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.
individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.
funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 340 total buyers.
wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair.
Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.
Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.
Holder = latest buyer per NFT. Traded NFTs only.
Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.
Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.
Top 20 NFTs by sale count.
Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.