live · collection summary

Sui Gods

0xc31b20bc301f572025575055925f86ddc5125ba20380ca5421d6d6aa390cb5fe::suigods_collection::SuiGods

#237 by volume#155 by sales#179 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Weak / thin demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.8×

225 cancelled / 286 created

offers accepted

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

3.0

290 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-08 18:43:52 UTC

The Suigods Collection has a tracked volume of 1,999 SUI, with no recent trading activity observed in the last 7 or 30 days, indicating a current pause in market engagement compared to typical top collections. Its holder concentration, with the top 10 holders owning 33% of the supply, is somewhat more concentrated than the typical top collection. However, the collection's bot-flagged holders and wash-traded volume are broadly in line with or even below peer medians, suggesting a relatively organic trading environment when active, and its largest single first-funder fan-out of 86 buyers demonstrates a solid initial distribution.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

•Top 10 holders hold 16% of supply
•9% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history

wash rateall tracked

0.2%

4 SUI washed

holder conc.current

16%

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

— vs prior 7d

volume30d

0 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 2.0k SUItop funder fan-out 216 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-10

supply & profit-taking

55%of held supply underwater

55% of the 999 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)

0.5 SUI

floor (robust)

0.8 SUI

median cost

999

held

<0.5×

442

0.5–1×

1–1.5×

1.5–2×

2–3×

243

3–5×

121

5×+

113

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

sweep cost depth

Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.

floor 0.30 SUIlisted 150 / 1,000 (15.0%) real sweep floor × n

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

61 active bidscollection-bid wall at 0.0–0.2 SUI (14 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

75%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 663 sell 221

seller hold time · flip speed

How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.

76dmedian hold before sale

25h

p10 (fastest flips)

15mo

p90

403

sales measured

<1h

1-24h

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

133

90-365d

>365d

minted/airdropped (12) bought secondary (391)

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

16d

median to sale

16d

median to cancel

completed listings

<1h

1-24h

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

87% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic

■ organic 252■ mid 15■ manufactured 0290 of 290 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

884

volume

1,999 SUI

distinct buyers

298

295 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

478

price distribution all-time

p10: 0.4290 SUI
p50 (median): 1.30 SUI
p90: 3.24 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

bluemove
33.3%
tocen
26.7%
tradeport
20.0%
souffl3
13.3%
other
6.7%

activity window

first sale: 2023-06-13 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2026-05-12 13:22:24 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 63 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 1d

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 290 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

GOATs Of Sui

78 shared · 27%

Bored Ape Pixels Club

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 290 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 2 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

1
0xba43b…4b6e0⇄0xd3091…b68f31 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 5.99 SUI
2
0x6d6cc…f0f0e⇄0x92cbb…42cfd1 NFTs cycled
1 round-trips · 1.54 SUI

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 549 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).