live · collection summary

Sui Gnomes

0xe81341eba87d19f8d53ee237b3666cff6a74c9fd7a960cf5753af69bc7c6a221::gnomes::Gnome

#50 by volume#68 by sales#289 by washamong 552 established collections (≥25 sales)

metrics cover all tracked history (indexed since 2025-04-05) unless a window — 7d / 30d / current — is labeled.

demand & order book

Weak / thin demand

Multi-signal read of the bid/listing event history — wash trading, bid cancellations, accepted-offer rate, and buyer spread. Context for review, not a verdict. Note: a high bid-cancel rate is common for liquid collections (bidders reprice constantly), so a high rate alone is NOT manipulation — only a repeatedly re-posted, repeatedly cancelled bid wall is. "Suspicious" is flagged only on real wash or spoof patterns, never low offers alone (utility/game items read as direct-buy).

wash volume

same-NFT round-trips

bid cancel

0.8×

524 cancelled / 691 created

offers accepted

sales meeting real demand

sales / buyer

4.2

824 buyers

bid activity over time all-time

Bids placed vs cancelled, weekly. A standing wall of bids that's repeatedly cancelled can signal manufactured demand — an on-chain signal, not proof.

AI readout · generated from the metricsgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · 2026-06-07 05:59:24 UTC

Gnomes has tracked 60,408 SUI in total volume, though recent trading activity is absent with zero sales in the last 30 days, which is below typical for top collections. Its 518 current traded holders are more concentrated in the top 10 at 13% compared to the typical 26% for top collections, and bot-flagged holders are slightly above average at 10%. A notable strength is its 0.0% wash-traded volume, significantly below the typical 0.1%, and the largest single first-funder fan-out of 197 buyers indicates a broad initial distribution.

signal scorecardverdict from on-chain forensics — evidence in the panels below

•10% of current holders are flagged bots
✓Volume looks clean — under 2% wash across tracked history

wash rateall tracked

0.0%

0 SUI washed

holder conc.current

13%

top-10 share of supply

bot holderscurrent

10%

score ≥ 0.30

volume7d

— vs prior 7d

volume30d

0 SUI

trailing 30d

velocity7d

sales / 7d

tracked volume 60.4k SUItop funder fan-out 549 buyerstracked since 2025-04-05 · windows anchored to dataset head 2026-06-08

supply & profit-taking

99%of held supply underwater

99% of the 2,548 secondary-bought · 0 minted (cost-unknown)

0.7 SUI

floor (robust)

22 SUI

median cost

2,548

held

<0.5×

0.5–1×

1–1.5×

1.5–2×

2–3×

3–5×

5×+

2,400

Cost basis as a multiple of the floor. Emerald = at/below floor (in profit); rose = underwater. Tall bars just above 1× are profit walls — supply that flips to break-even (and tends to list) as the floor rises.

sweep cost depth

Cumulative SUI to buy the cheapest currently-listed NFTs, vs % of supply. Real cost (teal) vs a naive floor-only sweep (dashed) — the gap is the depth premium. Built on validated listings, so phantom asks don't fake the floor.

floor 0.65 SUIlisted 239 / 2,548 (9.4%) real sweep floor × n

bid wall depth

Active bids by price. Amber = collection bids (fill against any NFT — the wall a seller can hit); teal = single-NFT bids. Where amber stacks up is the real floor support.

1 active bidscollection-bid wall at 3–3 SUI (0 bids) collection single

sale trigger · buy vs sell pressure

Each sale by who crossed the spread: teal = a buyer took a standing listing (demand); rose = a seller hit a standing bid (supply). Classified from the settling event, not a price guess. Buy-led markets pull the floor up.

100%buy-led(buyers taking listings vs sellers hitting bids) buy 2,548 sell 0 orderbook 927

seller hold time · flip speed

How long sellers held before selling. Violet = minted/airdropped then flipped; teal = bought on secondary then resold. A short violet pile is minters dumping; a long tail is a maturing holder base.

11dmedian hold before sale

24h

p10 (fastest flips)

9mo

p90

859

sales measured

<1h

1-24h

264

1-7d

219

7-30d

30-90d

149

90-365d

>365d

minted/airdropped (1) bought secondary (858)

listing duration · sold vs cancelled

How long listings stay open before they resolve. Teal = sold, rose = cancelled, amber = repriced. A wall of short rose bars is listing churn (list → cancel → relist); teal mass is genuine liquidity.

—

median to sale

median to cancel

completed listings

<1h

1-24h

1-7d

7-30d

30-90d

>90d

sold cancelled relisted

demand authenticity — funding sources all-time

77% of buyers funded from exchanges — demand looks organic

■ organic 637■ mid 37■ manufactured 39824 of 824 buyers have a known first-funder

First-SUI-funder of each buyer. High global fan-out = CEX/bridge (organic retail withdrawals). A funder that seeded many of THIS collection's buyers but funded little else (high concentration) = manufactured-demand signal. Funder identity is heuristic, not a labeled exchange list.

tracked sales

3,475

volume

60,408 SUI

distinct buyers

826

377 sellers

distinct NFTs traded

2,540

price distribution all-time

p10: 6.03 SUI
p50 (median): 18.19 SUI
p90: 22.00 SUI

quantilesTDigestMerge over every sale recorded.

marketplace mix (top 5) all-time

originbyte
66.7%
clutchy
33.3%

activity window

first sale: 2023-05-05 00:00:00 UTC
last activity: 2025-10-23 15:00:32 UTC

holder accumulation ribbon all-time

how the top holders built (and shed) their stacks over time. Each band is one holder; thickness = cumulative net market position (buys − sells) that week. 12 holders across 39 weeks.

Cumulative buys − sells, weekly. Market-acquired position only — excludes mints/airdrops/transfers, so the floor is clamped at 0.

mint-snipe timeline launch window

the launch window — first sales plotted by time since the collection's first trade (x, sqrt-scaled) and price (y, log). Snipers who bought and flipped the same NFT within an hour are flagged — the signature of launch front-running.

120 launch-window saleswindow 52s

rose= sniper (bought & flipped the same NFT within 1h) or bot buyer · sky= ordinary early buyer · click a dot for that NFT's provenance.

First 120 sales. Secondary-market launch only — mint events aren't yet indexed as sales.

shared user base all-time

collections most-bought by this collection's 824 buyers — its overlapping communities / gravity centers. Bar = shared buyers; % = share of this collection's buyer base.

Buyer-set overlap — a proxy for shared collectors, not on-chain co-custody.

most-traded NFTs all-time

individual NFTs ranked by sale count — a high count on one NFT is a wash-trading tell. Click any to see its full ownership provenance.

Top 20 NFTs by sale count.

money trail — shared funders of buyers all-time

funders (rose, left) that seeded ≥2 of this collection's buyers → buyers (grey) → collection (sky). A funder fanning to many buyers is a sybil/wash signal. 824 total buyers.

Traces the first SUI funder of each buyer.

wash-trade ring — fake volume all-time

wallet pairs that round-tripped the same NFT (A→B then B→A) — real wash trading, not just mutual transfers. Bar = distinct NFTs cycled between the pair. 0 NFTs round-tripped in this collection.

no wash round-trips detected — no NFT in this collection sold A→B then back B→A.

Round-trips where the same NFT returns to a prior seller.

first-week movers — who loaded early and flipped first 7d

Top 25 first-week buyers netted 537 SUI flipping in.

Buyers in the first 7 days of trading; net realized SUI = proceeds from all later sells − all buys (a proxy, not per-NFT cost basis).