all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
This wallet, 0x4bdc…eea5, appears to be a casual user of a routing protocol, likely for swapping tokens, given the repeated calls to `router::end_router_tx`, `router::begin_router_tx_and_collect_fees`, and `router::initiate_path_by_percent`. With a bot score of 0.00 and no other bot-like signals, this looks like a perfectly normal, if somewhat unexciting, human interacting with a DeFi router. Perhaps they're just exploring the Sui ecosystem, or maybe they're a very patient, very quiet, and very boring human.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x4bdc53072ba5b27ff1a653d8f664b9cefe7ce1d7afbb07470b622d5c2221eea5",
"n_tx": 29,
"n_successful_tx": 28,
"n_distinct_epochs": 5,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 2,
"first_seen_cp": 137117137,
"last_seen_cp": 145836847,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1745416232785,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1747397110749,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 66939164,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 19,
"n_sponsored_tx": 10,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 750,
"active_hours_top24": [
16,
13,
19,
14,
12,
18
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely UK / W. Europe / W. Africa.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail