all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x80e8…2c9c wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a routing service, likely for token swaps or transfers, given its repeated calls to `router::initiate_path_by_percent`, `begin_router_tx_and_collect_fees`, and `end_router_tx`. This wallet looks like a perfectly normal, if somewhat unexciting, human user; its bot score of 0.00 and lack of any bot-related signals suggest it's not an automated entity.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x80e885af2445ddf8d86fa7be3fd92605fee67d656ce48b12a409694662f72c9c",
"n_tx": 12,
"n_successful_tx": 12,
"n_distinct_epochs": 3,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 2,
"first_seen_cp": 143233669,
"last_seen_cp": 145161326,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1746816640956,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1747245426570,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 34390832,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 8,
"n_sponsored_tx": 4,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 740,
"active_hours_top24": [
5,
17,
16,
18
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely Atlantic / E. South America.