all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
The 0x74f6…c96f wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a router-based swapping mechanism, likely a DEX, given the `router::initiate_path_by_percent` and `router::swap` calls. This wallet is as human as they come, with a pristine bot score of 0.00 and no suspicious activity signals. It's so legitimately boring, it almost makes you wonder if it's a bot trying to look human.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x74f6dc429381d9511e8d5aa924043519237b5b96a31ccc5c0abce1b47019c96f",
"n_tx": 40,
"n_successful_tx": 40,
"n_distinct_epochs": 5,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 2,
"first_seen_cp": 137116307,
"last_seen_cp": 145858500,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1745416035294,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1747401969844,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 83612480,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 26,
"n_sponsored_tx": 14,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 750,
"active_hours_top24": [
13,
16,
6,
14,
11,
5,
18,
19,
4,
2
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely C. Europe / Africa / Middle East.