all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
all collections · daily · marketplace overlay
weekly · real (teal) vs wash (rose)
counterparties · funders · clusters
This 0x7dfc…7728 wallet appears to be a casual user interacting with a routing protocol, likely for token swaps or some form of asset management, given the frequent calls to `router::initiate_path_by_percent`, `router::begin_router_tx_and_collect_fees`, and `router::end_router_tx`. It looks like a normal human user, as its bot score is a pristine 0.00, with no suspicious signals fired – a truly boringly legitimate on-chain presence.
Wallets that share a funder, were co-funded by the same personal-scale source, or land in the same behavioral cluster. A heuristic, not proof of common control.
Tinted amber on the bubble map when they appear in the expanded graph.
casualRule-based labels, conservative precision.
Where this wallet's SUI first came from, and what it seeded downstream. Observational: a CEX funder suggests a real/retail origin; a high-fanout non-CEX funder is a signal worth noting — not proof of anything.
{
"wallet": "0x7dfcb1db631cc08e68ff93be8029b78c08bce451c0dfd65e37ae604b5d5a7728",
"n_tx": 21,
"n_successful_tx": 21,
"n_distinct_epochs": 4,
"n_distinct_sponsors": 2,
"first_seen_cp": 143220501,
"last_seen_cp": 145826679,
"first_seen_ts_ms": 1746813637860,
"last_seen_ts_ms": 1747394854074,
"total_gas_spent_mist": 58409376,
"n_self_sponsored_tx": 14,
"n_sponsored_tx": 7,
"gas_price_p50": 740,
"gas_price_p95": 740,
"active_hours_top24": [
18,
11,
15,
17,
6
],
"primary_archetype": "casual",
"labels": [
"casual"
],
"label_confidence": [
0.7
],
"bot_score": 0,
"bot_signals": [],
"cex_label": null
}Top active hours by UTC. Circadian peak → likely C. Europe / Africa / Middle East.
area + brightness = call volume; hover for detail